Go Back   NLL Forums > League Forum > NLL News and Rumors
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 08-17-2009, 05:21 PM
WILaxFan's Avatar
WILaxFan WILaxFan is offline
Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 540
Default NLL Rule Changes We'd Like to See

NLL Rule Changes We'd Like to See

Given that it has been somewhat quiet around the forum lately...

What are some NLL rule changes you'd like to see?

I'll start the discussion to get the ball rolling.

Current Rule - The current NLL rule on diving into the crease is:

Quote:
http://www.nllfiles.com/2009rulebook.pdf

CREASE INFRACTIONS
Rule 67: GOAL-CREASE VIOLATIONS
Page 55

Quote:
DIVING - Any attacking player, who in the act of diving or jumping into the crease, while passing or shooting, who makes contact with the crease prior to the ball completely crossing the goal line will result in no goal and a possession infraction.
Changed Rule - The rule language would be changed to:

Quote:
DIVING - Any attacking player, who in the act of diving or jumping into the crease, while passing or shooting, who makes contact with the crease prior to the ball completely leaving the stick will result in no goal and a possession infraction.
Benefits
This rule change - would cut down on the number of times referees have to make a determination if the timing of the crease violation occurred before the ball completely crossed the goal line.

Under the rule change, as long as the ball was out of the stick by the time the crease violation occurred, there would be no infraction.

Detriments
If you are a goalie, there will likely be a lot more diving shots into the crease.

What are some NLL rule changes other posters would like to see?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-17-2009, 05:39 PM
Fabio gump's Avatar
Fabio gump Fabio gump is offline
Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Middle of Nowhere, USA
Posts: 1,201
Send a message via AIM to Fabio gump Send a message via Yahoo to Fabio gump
Default

I and many here would like to see the summer ball power play rules used.

when you a man down, and you have the ball, the shot clock is turned off.
__________________
-gump
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-17-2009, 05:39 PM
RockStar#666's Avatar
RockStar#666 RockStar#666 is offline
Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Burkina Faso
Posts: 7,105
Default

Good call on the crease dives. Right now there is a conflict between rule 67 and Rule 46 a:

Quote:
Originally Posted by stupid NLL Rulebook
An attacking player may not be in the opponent's goal - crease area at any time. An attacking player who, after taking a shot on goal, or making a pass, steps by way of his momentum into the crease and then immediately out, is not in violation of the goal - crease area restriction.
This is from 2004, but I don't believe it has changed much if at all. According to this, you can break the crease as you are shooting as long as you step right out. What happens if you score? There is no time to get out of the crease before the whistle, so you're in violation. Whatever happens to these rules, the same thing should apply for a crease dives where there is no interference as for step-ins. Need to clean these up and make them agree.

Others:

How about bringing back the off-ball crosscheck?

Freezing the shotclock on man-shorts?

Shrinking the nets back to the "correct" size of 4'x4'6"?

Scrapping over-and-back during 5v5 play?

Legalizing woodsticks?
__________________
now you see that evil will always triumph because good is dumb.

Last edited by RockStar#666; 08-17-2009 at 05:41 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-17-2009, 06:06 PM
mtbf's Avatar
mtbf mtbf is offline
Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: North Tonawanda, NY
Posts: 7,401
Default

Quote:
How about bringing back the off-ball crosscheck?

Freezing the shotclock on man-shorts?

Shrinking the nets back to the "correct" size of 4'x4'6"?

Scrapping over-and-back during 5v5 play?

Legalizing woodsticks?
A high-five for those five

I would like to see if NLL go back to
If the ball goes out off post the O keeps the ball
Goalies serve their own minors
16 runners and two goalies dress
no instigator rule
High sticks 2, 4, 5 or 5 and GM
no behind the net goals
11 minute rule: 11 minutes in penalties = GM

new rules
-throwing a punch with your helmet on is a GM
-Offensive too many men is only a possession change
-Unlimited instant replays however after 1st challenge every one after costs a 2 min minor if you lose
Two five minute OT's no sudden death before sudden death kicks in
Best of two playoffs higher seed host game 2 and if teams split 1-1 10 minute mini game (two 5 minute halfs) sudden death if still tied

stuff to try in preseason:
-A two point line (see if it opens the game up for more inside play)
-Team that surrenders a goal starts with possession in the goal crease no more face offs
__________________
- Michael The Bandit Fan
---
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-17-2009, 06:08 PM
rnsykes's Avatar
rnsykes rnsykes is offline
Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 3,025
Send a message via AIM to rnsykes
Default

Change back the rule to dis-allow goals from behind the net. It adds nothing to the game.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-17-2009, 06:30 PM
RockStar#666's Avatar
RockStar#666 RockStar#666 is offline
Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Burkina Faso
Posts: 7,105
Default

MTBF makes some great suggestions here.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mtbf View Post
If the ball goes out off post the O keeps the ball

Goalies serve their own minors

16 runners and two goalies dress

no instigator rule

High sticks 2, 4, 5 or 5 and GM

-throwing a punch with your helmet on is a GM

-Offensive too many men is only a possession change

-Unlimited instant replays however after 1st challenge every one after costs a 2 min minor if you lose
I like all these pretty well as written.



Quote:
no behind the net goals I don't really care either way. If you're going to allow goals from behind, though, make it so you can do bank shots off the goalie's back, head, leg, or whatever too. Also, shouldn't it be a crease violation if the shooter's stick hits the goal before the ball crosses the line?

11 minute rule: 11 minutes in penalties = GM Would be fine with either 11 minutes, or just CLA style with five penalties


Two five minute OT's no sudden death before sudden death kicks in How about a full 15 period? Could even have ties after fifth period in regular season, but sudden death 6th period and onwards for playoffs.

Best of two playoffs higher seed host game 2 and if teams split 1-1 10 minute mini game (two 5 minute halfs) sudden death if still tied Love this. But will screw with home floor advantage decision! Do you want game 1 to try to get the win and control, or do you want last at-bats in front of your home crowd? Actually, one more thought - if you go with a best of two series you don't even really need playoff OT - win + tie = 3-1 series win. Only need to go to the mini game and sudden death if there's two ties

stuff to try in preseason:
-A two point line (see if it opens the game up for more inside play) Might as well see it. Need more than a few games to judge though. Would like to see it in the second and third periods in a preseason, just so you get it in effect with short bench and long bench changes
-Team that surrenders a goal starts with possession in the goal crease no more face offs Nah, this ain't basketball. Draws are fine, especially if they legalize tougher defense so there's not as many goals and not as many draws. One thing I wish they'd do is take their time getting setup for draws.......wouldn't it be wonderful if you could watch both the goal replay AND the faceoff?? All I need is 10 more seconds per draw, folks.....few minutes per game!
__________________
now you see that evil will always triumph because good is dumb.

Last edited by RockStar#666; 08-18-2009 at 07:13 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-21-2009, 01:48 AM
XcelLaX's Avatar
XcelLaX XcelLaX is offline
All-Star Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: New Berlin, WI
Posts: 332
Default

  1. No shot clock for shorthanded team in possession.
  2. Goalies serve own penalties.
  3. Have faceoff in nearest dot (to where the ball was at the last whistle) at the start of each penalty. This would (a) give the shorthanded team a shot at first possession and (b) make more use of the four "corner" faceoff dots, which hardly seem to be used at all under the present rules.
  4. Change OT to 3-minute non-sudden-death periods, as many as needed to break the tie.
  5. A 17th regular-season game per team, played in a neutral non-NLL market. (I've proposed this before, as a means of "test-driving" prospective markets for future expansion/relocation. Alternatively, one of these extra games could be played at the Iroquois Lacrosse Arena in Six Nations, either as the season opener or as a sort of "Hall Of Fame Game".)
  6. Change playoffs to 2-game aggregate (i.e. total goals) format, as often used in soccer, and formerly in college hockey. Lower seed hosts first leg w/ no OT. Higher seed hosts second leg. If teams are tied in total goals at the end of second leg, play 3-minute OTs as described above.
__________________
Four season tickets in Section 103, Row 24, Seats 5-8.
Lacrosse... a game so awesome, they named a city in Wisconsin after it.

Last edited by XcelLaX; 08-21-2009 at 02:04 AM. Reason: Added proposal for 17th regular-season game
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-21-2009, 03:16 AM
Lyle's Avatar
Lyle Lyle is offline
All-Star Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 413
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mtbf View Post
I would like to see if NLL go back to
no behind the net goals
Ok, I'm curious. Why no behind the net goals?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-21-2009, 04:17 AM
ND14's Avatar
ND14 ND14 is offline
Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 891
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rnsykes View Post
Change back the rule to dis-allow goals from behind the net. It adds nothing to the game.
Then why does it matter? Why not keep it as is?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-21-2009, 06:54 AM
toros_00's Avatar
toros_00 toros_00 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: iN bAnDItLaND
Posts: 8,299
Send a message via AIM to toros_00 Send a message via Yahoo to toros_00
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ND14 View Post
Then why does it matter? Why not keep it as is?
I don't mind being allowed to score from behind the net, but there is danger.

Because a player might hurt the goalie like throwing the ball of the back of his neck or something.
__________________
http://img170.imageshack.us/img170/6781/jtnllmbsigqa7.jpg
2°°9 BÚffä£õ BåñÐÎt§ 2°10
4 tIMe cHAmpS (92,93,96,08)
yOUr bUfFalO wHAt?¿?¿?¿?
bANdiTs!!~~*~**~~
#11 rUleS!~!~!~!
#44 MiKeY aCCurSi**!!**!!
#9 whO'Z HouSE?? STeEnHuIS!
#16 rIcHiE kIlGoUr~*~*~
#99 dElBY pOWleSs!$!$!$!$!
#66 MiKEY t rULes!*~!*~!*~!
wHat'S hE gOt?¿?
NOthIng!*!~!
BuFFalO WHaT?!?!?!?! BaNDiTs!~!*!~!*!~!*!
ORaNge & BLaCk
~~~*gO BAndITs*~~~
Click to E-mail me
NATIVE INVENTION...TAVARES PERFECTION!
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 08-21-2009, 07:34 AM
thrillis's Avatar
thrillis thrillis is offline
Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,219
Default

Remember, Goaltenders do not have protection on their back, and the back of the neck is always exposed. behind the net goals are pointless and just lead to an unnecessary danger.


As for this goalie serves their own penalties, thats rediculous. what other sport does that? were already a bush league sport, but lets at least try to keep it somewhat close to the real world here folks.



bring back the off ball checking and get rid of this dumbed down field lacrosse bullshit. anyone who watches canadas summer lacrosse leagues knows its a better game.

As for OT. Just do the cla style. one 10 minute OT, no sudden death. If you wnt to eliminate ties, Then bring in a sudden death period after that.


No shot clock on man down. Ragging the ball can be intense, and as a fan, you cant help but get into it when one guy has 2-3 guys completely pissed off for 2 minutes who beat the crap out of him and still cant get the ball. Do it CLA style with 10 seconds to get it into the offensive zone, and then the ball must remain inside the offensive zone the entire time. if the team crosses the line back, its a posession call and the powerplay team gets it back.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-21-2009, 08:40 AM
swami24's Avatar
swami24 swami24 is offline
Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Bucks Co. PA
Posts: 10,734
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mtbf View Post
A high-five for those five

I would like to see if NLL go back to
If the ball goes out off post the O keeps the ball
Goalies serve their own minors
16 runners and two goalies dress
no instigator rule
High sticks 2, 4, 5 or 5 and GM
no behind the net goals
11 minute rule: 11 minutes in penalties = GM

new rules
-throwing a punch with your helmet on is a GM
-Offensive too many men is only a possession change
-Unlimited instant replays however after 1st challenge every one after costs a 2 min minor if you lose
Two five minute OT's no sudden death before sudden death kicks in
Best of two playoffs higher seed host game 2 and if teams split 1-1 10 minute mini game (two 5 minute halfs) sudden death if still tied

stuff to try in preseason:
-A two point line (see if it opens the game up for more inside play)
-Team that surrenders a goal starts with possession in the goal crease no more face offs
Probably one of your best posts.

I don't mind the behind the net goals at all, it does add another demension to the game IMHO.
- I like the win or die in the playoffs. Yet it would be nice to see the finals be more than one game. That said, I hated not being able to go to baltimore im 98 for a midweek title capture.
- Absolutley no to the 2 pointer. Would lead to more boring desparate long shots, instead of the running cutting and hitting i want to see.
- keep the faceoffs. Winning one is a talent, why take talent away?

My suggestions.

NBA 5 second rule. A player cannot remain in the offensive zone, between the center line, and faceoff line, if they have the ball and are unmarked by a defender. No firiggin standing around out top with the ball, watching the shot clock go down.

Hip checks against the boards are legal. no charging, but I've seen some really marginal body to body contact called against the boards. Let them be physical;, but not dangerous up high.

Running over a defender when you have posssession of the ball is legal. Two of the most exciting plays I've seen in years were a full steam, bulldoze. Player (RVB?) at full speed, dropped shoulder right into the chest of a squared up defender, and flattened them. Those kind of plays have to be rewarded for their excitement, not given a 5 min charge.

You can only change three players per possession change. More running, more athleticism, more two way play. Far less standing around waiting for players to change.

My rules mainly look to add motion to the game. The bartley version of Off/def has mutated to a lot of standing around waiting for changes, a little operimeter passing and a last second shot. that has to change. they have to find a way to get back to the run and gun of the MILL.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-21-2009, 08:48 AM
chuckster's Avatar
chuckster chuckster is offline
Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Buffalo
Posts: 4,100
Default

I like alot of the suggestions but ultimately I don't care what the rules are......I just want the refs to make the right calls at the right times, and be consistent game in and game out.

It's maddening to watch different refs call the same infraction different ways, and to have one game a constant parade to the box while the next one has 8 minutes in calls between both teams......sometimes with the same officiating crew.
__________________
Proud to be a Buffalo Bandits season ticket holder since 1994.

"Sorry, Dad. I'm just being the voice of a generation" -- Leopold "Butters" Stotch.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-21-2009, 09:18 AM
WingsfaninMA's Avatar
WingsfaninMA WingsfaninMA is offline
Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Salem, MA
Posts: 7,514
Send a message via AIM to WingsfaninMA
Default

I don't like the 'scoring from behind the net' because it's just one more rule for the refs to miss. Did it deflect off the goalie? Did his stick hit the goalie first?

Black and white, if your feet are behind the line, it's no goal is much better.


Freezing the shotclock while SH seems like it should have been done 5 years ago. No-brainer way to not have 30-60 seconds of down time every PP.

Get rid of the loose ball push, unless it's totally from behind.

Goalies should be forced to serve minors.

Either call the moving picks more consistently, or get rid the call.
__________________
6 time champs!
1989, 1990, 1994, 1995, 1998, 2001...

----------------------------------

"Some fan wanted me deported for my actions in Denver." - John Grant, Jr., proving he can actually read and use the internet.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-21-2009, 12:36 PM
XcelLaX's Avatar
XcelLaX XcelLaX is offline
All-Star Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: New Berlin, WI
Posts: 332
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thrillis View Post
As for this goalie serves their own penalties, thats rediculous. what other sport does that? were already a bush league sport, but lets at least try to keep it somewhat close to the real world here folks.
What the hell's wrong with goalies serving their own penalties? That's why you dress two goalies. This isn't hockey or soccer; in-game goaltender changes are already commonplace in the NLL. The regular goalie would head to the box to serve the penalty, the backup would take his place in net, and his team would play with four runners for the duration of the penalty. Then once the penalty's over the team can add their fifth runner, though the goalie would have to stay in the box until the next whistle, at which point he could return to the net and the backup netminder could return to the bench.
__________________
Four season tickets in Section 103, Row 24, Seats 5-8.
Lacrosse... a game so awesome, they named a city in Wisconsin after it.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 08-21-2009, 01:01 PM
Jimbo's Avatar
Jimbo Jimbo is offline
Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Whitby-The Lacrosse Capital of the World
Posts: 1,955
Default

Three words-NO MORE PLATOONING.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 08-21-2009, 01:04 PM
9SQUIRE3's Avatar
9SQUIRE3 9SQUIRE3 is offline
Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,195
Send a message via ICQ to 9SQUIRE3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fabio gump View Post
I and many here would like to see the summer ball power play rules used.

when you a man down, and you have the ball, the shot clock is turned off.
why? that seems boring. You are being penalized for a player committing an infraction. That shouldn't make it so you can waste the time away. I have never seen this rule in use so maybe i do not see the benefits of it.
__________________
____________
TORONTO ROCK
CHAMPIONS
1999,2000,2002,2003,2005
_______________________
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 08-21-2009, 01:43 PM
swami24's Avatar
swami24 swami24 is offline
Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Bucks Co. PA
Posts: 10,734
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimbo View Post
Three words-NO MORE PLATOONING.
lest the coach get a wire hanger up the....
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 08-21-2009, 01:47 PM
ND14's Avatar
ND14 ND14 is offline
Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 891
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 9SQUIRE3 View Post
why? that seems boring. You are being penalized for a player committing an infraction. That shouldn't make it so you can waste the time away. I have never seen this rule in use so maybe i do not see the benefits of it.
You're from Toronto and you've never seen senior a summer ball? Shame! Get to Brampton on Monday to see the MSL playoffs!
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 08-21-2009, 11:16 PM
RockStar#666's Avatar
RockStar#666 RockStar#666 is offline
Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Burkina Faso
Posts: 7,105
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WingsfaninMA View Post
I don't like the 'scoring from behind the net' because it's just one more rule for the refs to miss. Did it deflect off the goalie? Did his stick hit the goalie first?.........
Alternate to getting rid of behind the net goals is to just not worry about how the ball gets in the net.....if it ends up inside, and there's no crease violation, let it be a goal.
__________________
now you see that evil will always triumph because good is dumb.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 08-21-2009, 11:20 PM
RockStar#666's Avatar
RockStar#666 RockStar#666 is offline
Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Burkina Faso
Posts: 7,105
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 9SQUIRE3 View Post
.........I have never seen this rule in use so maybe i do not see the benefits of it.
NLL Powerplay when man down team has possession:

Thumbs up their arse while two guys play catch high in the attack zone for twenty seconds before taking a meaningless shot or rolling ball into corner

CLA powerplay when man down team has possession:

zero to five plus minutes of frenetic violence as two or more guys are whaling the tar out of the ball carrier. More action, more shorthanded goals. Also, less concern about taking penalties so more aggressive play during 5v5.

I like CLA better, but, whatever. Lots of cheezy powerplay goals on lots of cheezy penalty calls is pretty cool too.
__________________
now you see that evil will always triumph because good is dumb.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 08-22-2009, 04:23 AM
Canadan's Avatar
Canadan Canadan is offline
Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: AJAX-PICKERING, COLLINGWOOD, WELLINGTON, BROOKLIN, BARRIE, BRAMPTON, K-W, OWEN SOUND, BUFFALO, AND THE HANGAR!!
Posts: 5,624
Send a message via MSN to Canadan Send a message via Yahoo to Canadan
Exclamation

Keep the 4' X 4'9" nets. It separates the "pretenders from the contenders".
__________________
GOODBYE DAD...JULY 12, 1920-MARCH 12, 2010.....I LOVE YOU, REST IN PEACE.

ROCK, EXCELSIORS, MANN CUP CHAMPS 2008, 2009, WOODSMEN, PRESIDENTS' CUP CHAMPS 2008, 2009...'NUFF SAID!! :D

NLL CHAMPS....'99, '00, '02, '03, '05

AN ORIGINAL ROADIE!

CANADA...HOME OF THE WORLD'S BEST LACROSSE PLAYERS!!

*1ST GOALIE TO SCORE A GOAL....FOR CHARITY!!*


www.seniorblacrosse.com
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 08-22-2009, 07:16 AM
goddessoflax's Avatar
goddessoflax goddessoflax is online now
Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: anywhere "T" &/or Troy &/or "V" is coaching
Posts: 3,964
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RockStar#666 View Post
NLL Powerplay when man down team has possession:

Thumbs up their arse while two guys play catch high in the attack zone for twenty seconds before taking a meaningless shot or rolling ball into corner

CLA powerplay when man down team has possession:

zero to five plus minutes of frenetic violence as two or more guys are whaling the tar out of the ball carrier. More action, more shorthanded goals. Also, less concern about taking penalties so more aggressive play during 5v5.

I like CLA better, but, whatever. Lots of cheezy powerplay goals on lots of cheezy penalty calls is pretty cool too.
No clock on man short is often some of the best lacrosse in any game. Mr. RockSatr666 can remind us of how long (can't remember...2002?) but I recall a playoff game against Brooklin early in Dan Dawson's major play when it seemed like nobody could take the ball from him.

Right now in the Major series final....Brampton's man-down is DDD, Doyle, Williams & Manning. For the Lakers....Sinder & three other guys. And with the defense these two teams have....the team with the advantage has to work hard to even get a shot. Gets the crowd into the game...even the casual fans.

What this rule does is force the team with the advantage to actually work for their goals. However....there is some physicality involved so...oh no! Somebody might hit somebody.....
__________________
Offense wins games...
...defense wins championships.


....with clarity of vision, strength of spirit & courage of heart.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 08-22-2009, 08:48 AM
dougm's Avatar
dougm dougm is offline
Hall of Famer
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: sewell, nj usa
Posts: 8,699
Send a message via ICQ to dougm Send a message via AIM to dougm Send a message via Yahoo to dougm
Default

would love to see no clock when man-down but it does raise an interesting querstion. would a team intentionally with 1:30 left in a tight game actually want to take a penalty and risk ragging the ball til the game clock reaches 0? if you have a guy like steenhuis, i might give it a go.
__________________
if you want to watch a real sport - its the nll; all the rest are just games!
sec 102 row 13 seats 17-18
dougm10@verizon.net

RIP Imeem - the best music social website ever.


http://music.myspace.com/Modules/Mus...4&plid=1016658
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 08-22-2009, 11:50 AM
RDGWings's Avatar
RDGWings RDGWings is offline
All-Star Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Berks County
Posts: 259
Send a message via AIM to RDGWings Send a message via Yahoo to RDGWings
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by swami24 View Post
You can only change three players per possession change. More running, more athleticism, more two way play. Far less standing around waiting for players to change.
Refs can't count 5 players changing how the heck are they gonna track who changes?

as for goalies and serving penalties...why not just make it a Penalty shot on the backup goalie...then you can put your offending goalie back in
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.